Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case
Scholars for 9/11 Truth


Two Great Posts by "underscribed"



Note: A sincere attempt has been made to reproduce the posts as they appeared on the forum. Forum discussions tend to be casual and typographical errors are not unusual.

"underscribed's" post
Posted: August 15 2007, 04:20 PM

I first heard judy wood about 3 months ago on a piss take about her and fetzer. It had me rolling about on the floor and i thought fetzer was doing this to disrupt the 911 movement etc. But since then i have heard judy explain in detail what she has scientifically uncovered and now i have to admit she is being more scientific than proff jones, who even though hes got the thermite /thermate mantra going, admits he cant conclusiveley say thermate was used, yet hes quite happy to go on alex jones and let the repeaters repeat the mantra of thermate, that is not what a scientist should do hes creating a myth without any conclusive scientific proof yet.

That picture of the digger with the molten metal in its claws, i always thought that didnt look real even before id heard the new science, and judy makes a good detailed point about the trucks working overnight been bringing dirt in to dump on the ground zero area, because with photographic evidence she documents the piles of debris and dirt got bigger as the dump trucks did there work on the once totally flat ground zero ,not smaller.

That in itself is an amazing piece of indisputable evidence that no one had uncovered but its a proven fact .

Judy wood does not say that explosives werent used at all by the way, she thinks they were used but as a decoy, so people would report hearing them.

by the way whatever blew those towers and made the debris and beams fly out in explosive power does not have to be conventional explosives.

And it is totally obvious to anyone with a brain that conventional explosives wouldnt have cause those cars to be zapped and toasted like they were.

also judy wood claims thermate has never been used in controlled demolitions, dr jones has created a myth that it is common practice but according to judy wood that is totally untrue..

Judy wood proposes a theory based upon what can be observed.

She suggests as a possible thesis that chemicals of some kind were within the towers placed within the structure and ignited by some means which caused total pulvorization of metal, steel ,concrete, human beings, leading to a complete and eventually total slowly over time as the chemical reaction worked (a bit like an alka setlezer reacts to water)- leading to complete dissolvation and so your left with nothing zip all gone into thin air.

and breathed in by those who were there on the day.




"underscribed's" post
Posted: August 15 2007, 05:00 PM

lets look at what i think are signs of media planting the very ideas of the conventional truth movement thesis.

as the towers disintegrated into nothingness one newsman actually says roughly,

"this looks like what we have all seen to many times , at las vegas etc , like one of those "controlled demolition""

so there we have the media proposing the 911 truth movements most general mantra controlled demolition.

next we have the media talking and profusely getting on the day

explosions
another explosion
get back that tower is going to FALL

explosions all given out by the media various times used by the 911 movement as proof of what is being called wacko now.

but explosions fit with controlled demo.
which as i said was in my opinion purposely said to sway the publics perception world wide and distract them from the TOTAL DISINTEGRATION OF MATTER.

as if the towers can fall gravity failure theory
which led the 911 movement to look for a reason for the fall instead of the disintegration of the mass.
and so they come to what
controlled demolition theyve already had it from dan rather? implaneted into their thought process when thinking of what made the FALL possible.

then we had the talk of heat lava etc but was it that hot and was it really lava
couldnt it have been something else.
but what do the media do on that day and afterwards
they say its molten and lava.
but now deny they said it.
but why now deny all this and call it wacko?

so the 911 truth mov can say look they said it they said it they reported explosions and dan rather said controlled demo look we caught them see how they lie?

which of course is precisely the reason they reported on it, so they could later deny or dismiss it so everyone would miss THE TOTAL DISINTEGRATION OF MATTER.

they did the same with the hole in the ground in shanksville and they did the same at the pentagon, one repoter in particualr had that job claiming there was no visible evidence of a plain hitting the pentagon so as the 911 truth mov would be chasing their tails saying look he said it then cos later ofcourse he denies thats what he said etcetc.

anything they said that is now seemingly confirmed by the 911 truth movements research is infact a cover story.

so if what i propose is true the media actually was leading the known reaction from the people with brains and guiding them in the areas they wanted them to go.
so as to completely distract any people with brains from addressing
THE TOTAL DISINTEGRATION OF MATTER.

So the 911 truth movement in fact even though unaware of their own mind op , end up promoting ANOTHER COVER UP.

And to top all that as if you need further evidence.

Now the Mainstream media allow these cover stories to be proposed on mainstream media

BBC CNN FOX NEWS DISCOVERY ETC ETC WORLDWIDE TO PEOPLE WHO DO NOT HAVE THE INTERNET AND TRUST THEIR VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE GLOBE.
SO THEY HEAR THE DEFEAT OF THE WACKO CONSPIRACY THEORISTS BY THEIR FOX NEWS HEROES
THESE WACKOS WHO ARE ENEMIES OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHO ARE GIVEN GREAT AND ABUNDANT AIRTIME BY
THE VERY SAME MAINSTREAM MEDIA WHO PLANTED THOSE VERY SAME THEORIES IN THE MINDS OF 911 TRUTH, WHO ARE THEIR ENEMIES AND SO MAKING CERTAIN THEY STOP EVERYONE INCLUDING THE WACKOS FROM LOOKING AT THE TOTAL DISINTEGRATION OF MATTER.







RFC: What Happened was Not Inevitable (6.5 Mb)
Supplement#1 to RFC submitted earlier (28 kb)
MEMORANDUM To: Dr. Judy Wood (232 kb)
DEW Information Request Letter, with comments
Supplement#2 to RFC submitted earlier (320 kb)
DEW Information follow-up letter to response from the Office of Public Affairs, Directed Energy

Response from Juventino R."Rich" Garcia via fax (original, more readable, enlargement)
Extension of NIST review for Dr. Judy Wood Request
Response to Request for Correction from Dr. Judy Wood, dated March 16, 2007 
APPEAL of NIST initial denial dated July 27, 2007 (7.9 MB pdf), 22 August 2007, by Dr. Judy Wood

(Other information available here.)



Dirt
WTC & Hutch (JJ)
Erin & Field (erin)
Billiard Balls
Qui Tam Case


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2007 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.