Jenkins panics

Bottom

homepage

Star Wars Beam Weapon

Dirt

Billiard Balls

Press Release

DQA-NIST

Whistleblower Information

Scientific Method

Why Indeed

FAQ

Disinfo

CriticsCorner


	Greg Jenkins Panics A Segment from the highly-funded Jenkins psyops July 2, 2007

Click on pictures to enlarge


Figure 1. After the towers are destroyed, the dust cloud rolls along the ground and some of it moves upward. It does not appear to be moving horizontally or downward. The southeast tip of Manhattan is covered in white dust. (9/11/01 entered) Source	Figure 2. Greg Jenkins panics when he realizes he wasn't able to trap Dr. Wood as he'd hoped he would.


Figure 3. Even though Greg Jenkins ambushed Dr. Wood for this surprise interview, he wasn't able to trap her. Imagine what the outcome would have been if he had informed her of his plans. Now, did Greg Jenkins really think he was helping the "truth movement"? If what Dr. Wood is presenting on her website is such nonsense, why would Greg Jenkins invest time and money into this? Why would Steven Jones recruit Greg Jenkins to do a smear job on Dr. Wood for his "journal"? Now, did Steven Jones really think he was helping the "truth movement"? Deliberately undermining the "truth movement" is an act of treason.

Video, pt3

Figure 4. Greg Jenkins panics. Note the video inserts. Why does this Greg Jenkins' video contain images that were not being discussed and issues that were not being discussed?
0:09:37 URL, (posted July 2, 2007) Link to transcript.

Photo

Figure 5. Greg Jenkins clearly studied just what he was to say and do. Unfortunately, he wasn't able to trap Dr. Wood as he'd hoped he would.

Photo

Figure 6. Why does Greg Jenkins have an agenda to convince us this didn't exist?
(9/12/01) Source: space imaging

Why has Greg Jenkins tried to convince folks that Dr. Wood is pointing up to the smoke coming from WTC1? The images below are screen captures from the Google video that Greg Jenkins had a professional film crew record and edit. Why has Greg Jenkins worked so hard to convince folks that all of the building "fell" down and none of it blew up? Dr. Wood is clearly pointing to the "snowball" cloud of dust in the photo. Why does Greg Jenkins insert a photo into the video to confuse the viewer? Dr. Wood is showing that approximately 2/3 of the building is no longer there and the volume of material in the "snowball" cannot account for it.

I wonder why the lighting is so different between the two cameras.

Greg Jenkins fails to manipulate Dr. Wood and begins to panic.

Why is Greg Jenkins so desperate to deny that a significant amount of dust went up?

Figure 7.

Link to transcript.

Figure 8. This is a satellite image captured on 9/12/01. It appears that the cloud emerging from the WTC site stays together until it reaches a particular altitude where it begins to just disperse. There appears to be a kink in the cloud trail where this occurs.
(9/12/01) Source: space imaging

Link to full transcript.

Steven Jones obviously condones the harassment of Dr. Wood and encourages it.

Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins, Recruiting the Hit Piece
The ambush "interview" with Greg Jenkins is here: (mp3)

What is the motivation of Greg Jenkins to do a surprise "interview" of someone at a time approaching midnight, after they had driven 600 miles just to be a supportive member of an audience? Apparently Steven Jones approves of such tactics.

At a time approaching midnight, Dr. Wood did not agree to discuss or "defend" anything. Is this what Steven Jones considers to be "science"? Do "scientific journals" recruit well-funded psyops hit pieces for their "journal?"

Email sent from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins:
Subject: Judy Wood interview
Relayed On: Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:24:04 -0500

[Begin quoted email]

From: Greg Jenkins (*** @http://gregjenkins.myfastmail.com)
To: DC 9/11 Truth mailto:dc911truth@googlegroups.com

I just received the following from Dr. Stephen Jones:

Hello, Greg --

Several weeks ago, we launched the Letters section of the Journal of 9/11 Studies. Perhaps you have seen it? Here we invite discussion of "hot" topics without requiring peer-review so as to encourage rapid feedback: http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters.html

I am writing to invite you to contribute a (short) letter if you will to Topic B:
B. Was a "star-wars" beam weapon used at the WTC?

The reason I ask is this -- Yesterday I watched your interesting interview with Judy Wood on this topic.
(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017) That was the first time I had heard Dr. Wood on a video, and she does try there to defend the energy-beam from space theory she is promoting. (Which as you must know, is causing quite a schism in the community right now...) Jim Fetzer has joined Judy in promoting this energy-beam idea -- he suggests the beam which hit the Towers came from WTC 7 in his Tucson talk, here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=646337772656177512

I think it would be very valuable to have a Letter to the Journal which provides the URL's to your interview with Dr. Wood, and to Jim F's talk, to allow readers to readily find the video-taped arguments by Judy and Jim F.

Would you be willing to compose then a brief letter to document this, emphasizing your interview? Pls let me know -- I would appreciate it. I have discussed documenting these two videos in the Letters section with the co-editor, Kevin Ryan, and he agreed that this would be a good idea.

If you do, it would be very helpful IMO to put two photos in your Letter with the text,
1- The photo you discussed with Judy and
2-- A photo from across the river, showing the smoke from the North Tower blowing "over" the South Tower... These would provide a preview to your interview. But that's up to you, of course.

Thanks for your efforts,

STeven J

(PS -- there is also a short clip by John Albanese which shows the dangers of discussing non-evidence based theories publicly, here: http://911blogger.com/node/5474#comment. FYI. Funny. )

[End of quoted email]

After reading the above email sent by Steven Jones to Greg Jenkins, one must ask, Was Jones' intention to improve the image of the "truth movement" or to undermine it? Recruiting someone to do a hit piece on a fellow researcher is not only unethical, it goes beyond the pale. This behavior by Steven Jones implies that he knows Dr. Wood is uncovering the truth and it is his job to prevent that or to prevent anyone from listening to her. If he were confident about his own research, he wouldn't feel threatened by another approach.

So, what motivates Steven Jones to recruit hit pieces on a 9/11 researcher?

Perhaps it is true that history repeats. For information on Steven Jones' involvement with cold fusion: (Fintan Dunn (mp3)) (Heavy Watergate (46 min)) (Heavy Watergate (at 1:21 min)) ("Fire from Ice," by Eugene Mallove.)

In his email, above, Steven Jones was probably not referring to the following photo, even though this is one of the photos that Dr. Wood referred to in the "discussion." Had she been informed of Greg Jenkins' plans, she would have come prepared with photos such as these.

Figure 9. After the towers are destroyed, the dust cloud rolls along the ground and some of it moves upward. It does not appear to be moving horizontally or downward. The southeast tip of Manhattan is covered in white dust.
(9/11/01 entered) Source

Figure 10. This is the corner of West and Vesey Streets, looking southward down West Street. After the towers are destroyed, there seems to be very little material on the ground. Where did the building go? WTC6 is directly ahead. WTC1 should be just behind it. Where did it go?

(This photo has been lighten and reduced in size. For original, click on the photo.)
(9/11/01) Source

Shortcut links

Jump to Jones recruits Jenkins

Top