Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

Figure 62. EVO.jpg
(11/29/07?) Source: pdf

Hutchison Effect	Cold Fusion	THE ENERGETICS OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES ALL HAVE A COMMON BASIS IN ELECTRON CLUSTERING
Slow Bending Of Metals Shredded Metal Structures Fractured Metal Structures Propulsion--Both Slow and Impulsive Melting Without Heat Metal Luminance Without Heat EVO Strikes Abound in Sample	Thermal Cycling Method Has EVO Evidence Gas Discharge Method Has EVO Evidence Electrolytic Method Has EVO Evidence Sonic Method Has EVO Evidence	PLASMA FOCUS HUTCHISON EFFECT ADAMENKO WORK EVO ENERGY PRODUCTION & TRANSMUTATION COLD FUSION
Figure 63a. EVOs AND THE EVOs AND THE HUTCHISON HUTCHISON EFFECT: NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION FROM LOW NUCLEAR TRANSMUTATION FROM LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE Paper presented at the MIT Cold Fusion Conference Paper presented at the MIT Cold Fusion Conference, May 21, 2005 May 21, 2005, by Ken Ken Shoulders (11/29/07?) Source: (archived)

Cold Fusion Nuclear Measurement Errors: Many nuclear measurement errors are possible in the presence of the deeply penetrating characteristics of EVOs. The errors stem from the use of energy dispersive measurement and absorption methods being used instead of wavelength dispersive techniques. Crystal detectors, some scintillation methods and CR-39 nuclear detectors should not be used as they make a gentle EVO passage look like a cosmic particle event. On page 15 of [2], EVO like particles measured on 2 plastic scintillation detectors as moving at V~20-40 m/s. registered an energy of E ~700 MeV on RFZMP fluorographic film detectors. With EVOs, velocity is not the best indicator of total energy content. Bent crystal spectroscopes and spectrometers should be used to measure radiation whenever there is doubt about the presence of EVOs.

The resulting errors in measurement have lead to many bad assumptions in the work associated with plasma focus machines and in cold fusion technology, where EVOs occur profusely. These errors are at the root of the arguments over the origin of cold fusion energy production and transmutation. With EVOs present, nuclear transmutation is almost always present and these EVOs are the root cause of the excess energy produced [8]. No energy release has been directly traced to the transmutation process itself.

Figure 63b. Microscopic Radiological Treatment Using EVOs
by Ken Shoulders •2007
(5/5/07) Source: (archived)

"A less frequent phenomenon is the apparent heating to incandescence of iron and steel specimens having high length to width rations. This event is not accompanied by the heating, charring or the burning of combustible materials in contact with the specimen throughout the duration of the event of about two minutes. The fracturing of certain iron and steel geometries accompanied by an anomalous residual magnetic field, permanent in nature, is not uncommon."

Figure 64. Quote by Richard Sparks, Scientific and Technical Intelligence/SBIR, Ottawa.
(1996) Source: The Hutchison File, or archived (searchable) page 67 of 87.

Figure 65. “The Hutchison Effect,” filmed (11/29/07)
This video can be downloadable here: mpg. (4.7 MB)
(0:00:00) URL, Source: HutchisonPE.swf


Figure 68. I (11/29/07?) Source: mpg. (4.7 MB)	Figure 69. I (11/29/07?) Source: mpg. (4.7 MB)	Figure 70. I (11/29/07?) Source: mpg. (4.7 MB)	Figure 71. I (11/29/07?) Source: mpg. (4.7 MB)


Figure 78. [pedestrian bridge carr-roof fire] (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 79. [pedestrian bridge carr-roof fire] (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 80. [pedestrian bridge carr-roof fire] (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 77. [2n9jkbd.jpg] (9/11/01) Source:

Figure 72.
(0:00:00) URL
Video of the flash that can be downloadable here: mov. (3 MB)


Figure 73. I (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 74. I (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 75. I (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 76. I (9/11/01) Source:


Figure 81. [AftermathReuters10.jpg] (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 82. [5139~0.jpg] (9/11/01) Source:


		Figure 28. Image169.jpg (9/11/01) Source:

Figure 83. I (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 84. I (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 30. Image167.jpg (9/11/01) Source:

Figure 85. 02105v_c.jpg (trimmed), 02105v.jpg (original)
(9/11/01) Source:


Figure 86. 0063v.jpg (9/11/01) Source:	Figure 87. 0064v.jpg (9/11/01) Source:


Figure 2. This is called the "Cheeto" picture because the orange object in the lower left corner looks like a Cheeto. (9/??/01) Source (also here and here)	Figure 3. But, is this photo really what it seems? Note the exposed hydraulics. (9/??/01) Source (also here and here)

"Hydraulic fluid temperatures above 82°C (180ºF) damage most seal compounds and accelerate oil degradation. A single [emphasis added] overtemperature event of sufficient magnitude can permanently damage all the seals in an entire hydraulic system, resulting in numerous leaks. The by-products of thermal degradation of the oil (soft particles) can cause reliability problems such as valve-spool stiction and filter clogging."

Viscosity Value	cSt	Temperature (VG68)
Minimum Permissible	10	95ºC
Minimum Optimum	16	78ºC
Optimum Bearing Life	25	65ºC
Maximum Optimum	36	55ºC
Maximum Permissible	1,000	2ºC

Table 1. Correlation of operating viscosity values
with fluid temperature based on fluid viscosity grade
(6/16/07 accessed) Source

Figure 4. Temperature/viscosity diagram for ISO viscosity grades. Note that the gradient of the lines shown will depend on the viscosity index of the particular fluid used.
(6/16/07 accessed) Source

Brendan Casey, "Hydraulic Equipment Reliability: Beyond Contamination Control". Machinery Lubrication Magazine. July 2005
(6/16/07 accessed) Source


Figure 81. (9/11/01) Source: [AftermathReuters10.jpg]	Figure 82. (9/11/01) Source: [5139~0.jpg]

"The levitation of heavy objects by the Hutchison Effect is not---repeat not---the result of simple electrostatic or electromagnetic levitation. Claims that these forces alone can explain the phenomenon are patently ridiculous, and easily disproved by merely trying to use such methods to duplicate what the Hutchison Effect has achieved, which has been well documented both on film and videotape, and has been witnessed many times by numerous credentialed scientists and engineers. Challengers should note that their apparatus must be limited to the use of 75 Watts of power from a 120 Volt AC outlet, as that is all that is used by Hutchison's apparatus to levitate a 60-pound cannon ball."

Quote 90. The Hutchison Effect -- An Explanation, by Mark A. Solis
(1996) Source: http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/8863/HEffect1.html


Figure 91a. Boyd Bushman on Anti Gravity (0:00:00) URL This video can be downloadable here: mpg. (x.x MB) Source: From Google video, "Billion Dollar Secret" 1 hr 40 min 10 sec - Apr 10, 2007 Written and presented by Nick Cook	Figure 91ba. Free Energy John Hutchison -High Qual. MUST SEE! [Part 4] (00:10:00) URL

Power Level
NEED PHOTO CLIP?

Rationalizing the "Hutchison Effect"

Now, what is the "Hutchison Effect? My peak power was 110 volts at 400 volts.[obviously a Typo -- will correct] This of course was transformed to signal generators* radar systems, broadband systems and high voltage systems and magnetic pulsed coils (4Hz) with an overlap of saturation in the iron core so that one would have a waveform showing this.

If one was to study Rene Louis Vallee's and Tom Bearden's work on time reverse waves and scalars, one could see how both phenomena lend to this effect in some way.

Vallée does predict a depletion of energy in the structure of space in the vicinity of an earth sized concentration of mass of 57,000 MegaJoules less per cubic meter than that of a cubic meter of interstellar space. If this is so and the potential does exist, then the energy available to produce the observed effects would be of the proper magnitude. Assuming less than 100 % conversion efficiency of my equipment and given the dimensions of the samples, it would seem that the more massive a sample, the greater the potential energy flow.

Figure 92. Comments by John Hutchison.
(1996) Source: The Hutchison File, or archived (searchable) page 45 of 87.

14. Vallée does predict a depletion of energy in the structure of space in the vicinity of an Earth-sized concentration of mass of 57000 megaJoules less per cubic meter than that of a cubic meter of interstellar space. If this is so and the potential does exist, the energy available to produce the observed effects would be of the proper magnitude, assuming less than 100% conversion efficiency of our apparatus, and given the dimensions of our target specimen. This being the case, we can assume that the more massive the target specimen, the greater the potential energy flow.

Figure 93. by Richard Sparks, Scientific and Technical Intelligence/SBIR, Ottawa. Could this explain why the dust cloud starts out a little cooler?
(1996) Source: The Hutchison File, or archived (searchable) page 69 of 87.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

Top

homepage

Star Wars Beam Weapon

Dirt

WTC & Hutch (JJ)

Billiard Balls

Press Release

Legal Challenges

Whistleblower Information

Scientific Method

Why Indeed

FAQ