EVIDENCE FOR DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS PUT FORWARD IN A DQA REQUEST FOR CORRECTION: PERSONS WITH SUPPORTING INFORMATION ARE ASKED TO COME FORWARD AND BE HEARD

Why were these two cases denied? Why in such a hurry?

elapsed time Wood Motion to reconsider was filed Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:40:18 -0400 Motion to reconsider was denied Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:10:20 -0400 6:30:02 Reynolds Motion to reconsider was filed Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:51:32 -0400 Motion to reconsider was denied Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:25:42 -0400 6:34:10

Dr. Wood's Case:	Dr. Reynolds' Case
Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3 July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT Wood_motion_reconsider.html 080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf	Qui-Tam, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3 July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart, Danbury, CT Reynolds_motion_reconsider.html (available soon) 080711_Reynolds_CV4612_139.pdf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---

Dr. Judy Wood on behalf of the United States of America, Plaintiff/Relator, vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc., et al., Defendants. Wood-Denial of Reconsideration ( Filed July 11, 2008 in response to request filed July 11, 2008.) Page 1 of 1

Dr. Morgan Reynolds on behalf of the United States of America, Plaintiff/Relator, vs. Science Applications International Corp., et al., Defendants. Reynolds-Denial of Reconsideration ( Filed July 11, 2008 in response to request filed July 11, 2008.) Page 1 of 1

Comments?
I would like to know your thoughts on the above decision. You may leave a brief anonymous message, a contact source and/or a time/method to contact you. 500 character limit. You may also specify a particular recipient.

Qui-Tam, updates