Bottom | homepage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by
Dr. Judy Wood and John Hutchison
This page last updated, April 1, 2008
Page 7 index
|
|
VII. Free Energy · Cold Fusion · Dr.Martin Fleischmann · Managing Public Opinion · Dr. Eugene Mallove |
· Dr. Ken Shoulders · William Zebuhr · Michael Zebuhr · Heavy Watergate |
Steven Jones - 9/11 Parallels
|
Heavy Watergate Steven Jones Scandal
|
|
|
Figure 1. Russ Gerst talks with Jim Fetzer. (0:00:00) URL, From: pumpitout, Posted August 12, 2007 |
Figure 2. Segment from the video, Heavy Watergate. (0:00:35) URL, |
Steven E. Jones sabotaged cold fusion and he is sabotaging the truth about 9/11. Watch Heavy Watergate (can be seen on google video) Also look into Eugene F Mallove who was murdered May 14, 2004. | Steven Jones is described as an opportunist who was tipped off by "DoE informants" to help coverup the reality of free energy. |
Near the the end of the segment, Steven Jones indicates he knows there has been no declaration that energy weapons must be space based. So, what motivates him to promote false information about another researcher's work? Steven Jones received funding from the DOE for 15-20 years and in the area of "Cold Fusion." With his background, saying it's impossible for energy weapons to destroy the WTC raises a red flag. |
Figure 3. Here is an excerpt from an Alex Jones show when he had Steven Jones on, 1/31/07. (0:03:00) (mp3) (2.2 MB) |
Alex Jones refers to those who conducting a true scientific analysis of what happened on 9/11 as "Marvin the Martian proponents" and Steven Jones agrees.
Steven Jones also misrepresents the work of Dr. Wood and fails to address the real issue of molecular dissociation without heat. The amount of energy required to cook the buildings is irrelevant as the buildings were not cooked. |
|
||
Figure 4. Here is an excerpt from an Alex Jones show when he had Steven Jones. (0:01:47) (mp3) (0.424 MB) |
Figure 6. 1989 Steven Jones, "Read my lips." (0:00:00) (mp3) (1.3 MB) |
Breaking Through Editorial: Ethics in the Cold Fusion Controversy (Originally Published January-February, 2001 In Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #35) by Eugene Mallove |
Dr. Steven Jones in his skeletal three-page commentary confirms that he still trusts his sparse cold fusion neutron measurementsfair enough. But Jones, the egocentric denier of excess heat claims from day one, apparently has learned nothing and still knows nothing about the process of science. He is an example of the kind of scientist identified in the Bockris quote above. Jones writes disingenuously, "It is high time to strongly question claims of cold fusion based on crude techniques and to demand tests at a rigorous scientific-proof level. . .I have not seen any compelling evidence of any 'cold fusion' effects to date." |
Figure 7. Excerpt from "Breaking Through Editorial: Ethics in the Cold Fusion Controversy" (January 2001) Source: |
Dr. Martin Fleischmann Top
Reflections on the Sociology of Science and Social Responsibility in Science, in Relationship to Cold Fusion Professor Martin Fleischmann, Fellow of the Royal Society Bury Lodge, Duck Street Tisbury, Salisbury, Wilts SP3 6LJ England. Accountability in Research, 2000. 8: p. 19. |
Section 12. In conclusion; Conspiracy Theories? |
It will be clear to those familiar with some of the background of the topic of "Cold Fusion" that there are many aspects which I have not considered in this article - notwithstanding its length. The strange behavior of the Patent Office, the strange presentations in some of the books devoted to the subject, the strange behavior of a number of scientists concerned with the research, the strange circumstances surrounding the preparation and publication of the Report commissioned by the Department of Energy, the strange behavior of the Editors and Editorial Staff of some of the Scientific Journals and many other matters all deserve detailed scrutiny. Much of this behavior has an intimate bearing on the role of Science in our Society. I have often been asked whether all of these strange happenings might not be explained by a Conspiracy Theory or else a series of conspiracies linked to some central Conspiracy Theory. My reply has always been that it is usually tempting to invoke Conspiracy Theories but that one should only do so only as a last resort. Instead, I subscribe to a different theory, put forward by a former colleague, best described as "The Cock-up Theory of History". Nevertheless, one must ask oneself the question: suppose that one would wish to frustrate research within a given field of research, without wishing to admit that this is ones intent. Then would one not take the steps which have been illustrated by the example of "Cold Fusion"? At the present time readers will have to reach their own conclusions as to what may be the explanation of the strange events which have surrounded this field of research. |
Figure 8. (2000) Source: pdf: (archived) |
Audio. Steve Krivit interview with Martin Fleishmann, August 24, 2003. (8/24/2003) Source: (mp3) (4.8 MB) (27:50 in length) |
Audio. "The hole in the floor" (Cute story, from a portion of the above interview (approx. 16:20-19:02 in above interview)) |
Figure 9. (8/24/2003)Source: (mp3) (4.8 MB) (27:50 in length) (8/24/2003) Source: (mp3) (0.484 MB) (2:42 in length) |
This may be how "public opinion" is managed.
|
|
|
|
Figure 10. [emphasis added] Reference: Physlink.com |
Breaking Through Editorial: Ethics in the Cold Fusion Controversy (Originally Published January-February, 2001 In Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #35) by Eugene Mallove |
||
Dr. Shamoo, of the Department of Biological Chemistry at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, states in his lead editorial that he had formerly assumed that cold fusion had been debunked. That is, until plasma physicist Dr. Robert Terry politely told him that "the jury was still out" on the subject. Shamoo admits that in his teaching about research ethics he had often used the cold fusion episode as an example of how the "self-correcting nature of science" works. Now his view is entirely different, summarized in this key passage from his editorial:
Dr. Martin Fleischmann in his essay provides a comprehensive historical review of the thinking which led him and Stanley Pons to experiment with the deuterium-palladium system in the mid-1980s. He touches on social and media questions, though not heavily. And, he addresses the role that military security issues may have played in the controversy. At one point he makes a very pertinent remark: "One outcome of this research has been the demonstration that scientists have developed a blindness for accepting unusual results. No doubt this is due in part to an excessive faith in invalid paradigms." Dr. Bockris makes an equally compelling comment: "A comfortable illusion of the 20th Centuryheld not by scientists themselves, but by the tax payersis that scientists are, somehow, above the fray and highly honest. What a lot of nonsense this is!"
Dr. Steven Jones in his skeletal three-page commentary confirms that he still trusts his sparse cold fusion neutron measurementsfair enough. But Jones, the egocentric denier of excess heat claims from day one, apparently has learned nothing and still knows nothing about the process of science. He is an example of the kind of scientist identified in the Bockris quote above. Jones writes disingenuously, "It is high time to strongly question claims of cold fusion based on crude techniques and to demand tests at a rigorous scientific-proof level. . .I have not seen any compelling evidence of any 'cold fusion' effects to date." The main virtue of this special issue of Accountability is that discussion of cold fusion has been brought to a larger and different academic audience. Like Editor-in-Chief Shamoo, that audience may have believed the prevailing myth that cold fusion was honestly debunked in 1989. Newcomers will be able to learn from the scientific papers cited in many of the essays that this is not true. What effect this enlightenment may have in wider academe is uncertain, but it could not hurt the cause of truth. |
||
Figure 11. Excerpt from "Breaking Through Editorial: Ethics in the Cold Fusion Controversy" (January 2001) Source: http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue35/ethics.html |
Dr. Eugene Mallove Top
|
Dr. Ken Shoulders and Bill Zebuhr Top
Issue 61 of Infinite Energy Magazine, May/June 2005 Also see: Charge Clusters in Action, Ken Shoulders and Steve Shoulders (pdf from Shoulder's site) |
Charge Clusters: The Work of Ken Shoulders By William Zebuhr, Chairman of the New Energy Foundation |
Our cover article in this issue is about charge clusters, which are compact groups of electrons. They defy the common belief that such things cannot occur because of the great repelling forces these electrons should exert on each other. Yet they do appear to exist and are not even that difficult to create, once you know how. Ken Shoulders knows how and has been doing it for about 25 years. Ken and his son Steve experiment with charge clusters (also called exotic vacuum objects or EVOs) in a well-equipped, privately funded lab in California. Ken has a history of working at the edge of science and engineering. He worked at SRI International for ten years as a staff scientist and started a field now called vacuum nanoelectronics, which is based on field emission active devices. He also worked at MIT (during this time he fabricated the world's first microcircuits) and later did some exotic and confidential work for the CIA and others. |
Figure 17. Issue 61 of Infinite Energy Magazine, May/June 2005 (xxx) Source: http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue61/chargeclusters.html |
See also Ken Shoulders' EVOs - Exotic Vacuum Objects Challenge Particle Theory, and EVOs and Hutchison Effect |
Issue 56 of Infinite Energy contains numerous tributes to its editor, Eugene Mallove, who was killed on May 14, 2004. Below we reprint the memorial presented by the New Energy Foundation Board of Directors. The non-profit New Energy Foundation publishes Infinite Energy and its directors take this opportunity to introduce themselves to the public and assure readers that the magazine will continue to publish. |
Memorializing Gene By Bill Zebuhr, Chairman of the New Energy Foundation |
We have all suffered a great loss. Gene Mallove was killed on the evening of Friday, May 14. He was at his childhood home in Norwich, Connecticut, cleaning up between tenants, when he was murdered in an apparent robbery. Infinite Energy will provide reports as more details become available. Gene's tragic death made me wonder once again about the nature of the universe. How can a brilliant, hard working, loving individual who has contributed so much and asked for so little be killed by worthless thugs? Maybe we need to rethink the whole issue of personal defense. I only knew Gene for about three years, but we became very good friends quickly. The news of his death was probably the most horribly shocking I have ever heard. Gene asked me to be Chairman of the New Energy Foundation (NEF) Board of Directors because of my background and my strong interest in Infinite Energy Magazine and the peripheral projects he was involved in. Neither one of us expected that I would have to do very much hands-on work in that role, but all that has changed. That is how I happen to be writing this. The NEF is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit foundation that allows contributors to take a federal tax deduction. Its purpose is to promote the exploration of new science and technology that is energy related and out of the realm of conventional paradigms. The NEF does this primarily through publication of IE and secondarily through direct grants to inventors/scientists and organizations working in the "new energy" field. The NEF was formed in the Fall of 2002. The former company's (Cold Fusion Technology) major assets, including Infinite Energy, were transferred to the foundation. After a lengthy battle with the IRS, Gene was able to get the foundation its non-profit status in July 2003. The NEF Board of Directors believes that the NEF has enough history and enough depth that even though Gene's presence was pervasive, his work can continue without him and this is surely what he would want from us. The Board of Directors and staff of IE are fully and enthusiastically committed to building on Gene's goals and visions. We would like to take this opportunity to formally introduce the NEF Board of Directors. Members are Rick Broussard (Vice-Chairman), Mark Aldrich (Treasurer), James Kazan (Secretary), and myself (Chairman). I am a mechanical engineer (master's degree, Cornell University) with experience in the large corporation world, the defense industry, and extensive experience as an inventor and entrepreneur in the energy and environmental fields. I am currently founder and CEO of Ovation Products Corporation, which has developed a small vapor compression distiller which has broad application in cleaning water for domestic and industrial use worldwide (see Ovationproducts.com). I have about thirty patents and have a great interest in finding creative solutions to address the world's energy and environmental issues. Rick Broussard is Editor-in-Chief of New Hampshire Magazine and a writer of numerous articles on topics related to culture and science. Along with his role as a board member for the New Energy Foundation, he is a board member of the New Hampshire Stories, Inc. board, a member of the New Hampshire Humanities Council board of advisors, and committee chairman for the New Hampshire Theatre Awards. Mark Aldrich is currently the Economic Development Director of Claremont, New Hampshire. In December 1999, he retired after working for twenty years for the United States Senate, where he was the N.H. Chief of Staff to United States Senators Bob Smith and Gordon Humphrey. Mark was responsible for the administration of the Senators' four New Hampshire offices and served as the Senators' state representative and intergovernmental liaison, representing them at various events and ceremonies. He also had a major role in advising the Senators on major environmental issues affecting the state. He is a graduate of the University of New Hampshire with a degree in political science (minor in anthropology), and he holds an MBA from New Hampshire College. He is also a licensed NH real estate broker. Jim Kazan is a New Hampshire lawyer and a partner in the firm of Kazan & Shaughnessy, located in Manchester, New Hampshire. He graduated with high distinction from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1973. Before entering private practice in New Hampshire in 1980, he served as a law clerk to both the United States 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis, Missouri, and the New Hampshire Supreme Court. He has also served as an Assistant Commissioner of the New Hampshire Insurance Department and as a New Hampshire Bar Examiner. Jim became acquainted with Gene a number of years ago at Temple Beth Jacob in Concord, New Hampshire, where both of them served on the Board of Trustees. Later, as an officer of the Temple, Jim worked with Gene in presenting a series of lectures on "Science & Religion," all of which featured Gene. Although Jim does not have a formal science background, he is an amateur astronomer and loved talking with Gene about science topics. The Board of Directors elects and directs the executives of the organization, in addition to other responsibilities (which will now be more formal and broadened). This is still a small organization. Gene was the President of the NEF and Editor-in-Chief of its magazine and Christy Frazier is the Managing Editor of the magazine. Since Christy was active in the business operation of the NEF and IE with Gene, she has recently been given the title of General Manager of the NEF and will perform many of the executive business functions. Her dedication, talent, judgment, and energy throughout this difficult and emotionally draining transition has been amazing. We will need to replace Gene's editorial function and his technical expertise, but the operation is in excellent hands. There will be a transition period where IE will continue as it has been, but with guest editorials. Readers will be happy to know that the next four issues of IE will primarily be made up of materials that Gene himself had authorized. Decisions regarding direction and content will be mostly made by Christy and myself with input from our Board members, Scientific Advisory Board, past contributors, associates, and friends of Gene who have been involved in some way with the foundation or magazine. There is a great deal of will and ability in this group to not only continue but to build on and improve. We also welcome constructive suggestions from readers as to content, direction, and form. If there is any silver lining to the awful event of Gene's death it is that I have had the good fortune to know some of these outstanding people that are, and will be, helping. I have also gotten to know Gene's wonderful family better. His wife Joanne, daughter Kim, and son Ethan all have been very helpful in spite of their trauma. The foundation is working with them to ease the transition as much as we can. Kim and Ethan are interested in taking a more active role in helping to continue their father's work and these efforts will be integrated in as time goes on. None of the foundation's work could get done without money. We are extremely grateful that our major contributors have confidence in the NEF team and have been very supportive. We are also grateful for all the contributions that came in after Gene's death to help assure his work will continue. Of course, every reader is a supporter and we thank you all. One of our goals is to find more like you. The transition period will probably be four or five issues. During that time we will seek additional Board members to add depth and facilitate activities such as fund raising, finding new editorial talent and new material, and filling Gene's important role as a major new energy contact for inventors, investors, and the press. Gene stated in the last issue (IE #55, p. 6) "that IE must be a mixture of original scientific research and explanatory and motivating editorial material." Explanatory to make "difficult scientific concepts accessible to lay audiences" and motivating because it is not always clear what paths should be taken and many paths are rough. Matching Gene's spirit will not be easy, but we will try our best. Change will be inevitable because of the people involved and because technology moves on. We will maintain the general high quality of the science reported and will seek as big an audience as possible for such quality. We will continue to be controversial because that is the very nature of new science. We will continue to pull at the threads of the fabric of conventional science and will hope for some good ripping sounds. We have to be able to live with the uncertain and admit that we often don't know the answers. Some theories look good for awhile and then look silly. These are chances we have to take to exist in our chosen niche. We will try to avoid "ownership" of ideas so that we don't acquire a vested interest and lose our sense of openness and fairness. We want to maintain a healthy outlook and perspective so that readers can sense the importance of the science and technology in a proper world view. Hopefully this will motivate activity in directions that yield the most benefit to the planet and to the individuals doing the work. The Board and management of NEF and IE are dedicated to the cause. We believe this is very important work and can evoke major changes far beyond what the size of our readership might suggest. We are there for the few who are really capable of changing the world. Science and technology drive world change and the spirit of discovery can drive the technology. We owe gratitude and eternal thanks to Gene Mallove for his important contribution to the world. Founding IE and the NEF is just, to use one of Gene's favorite expressions, "the tip of the iceberg" of what Gene has accomplished for new energy science. The tributes in this special issue are just some of the many proofs that Gene was a good, honest man who fought for what he believed in in all areas of life, not just science. May Gene's spirit guide us to new heights. |
Figure 18. Memorializing Gene, by Bill Zebuhr, Chairman of the New Energy Foundation (June 2004) Source: http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue56/memorial.html |
Michael Zebuhr Top
In Memory of Michael Zebuhr September 21, 1980 - March 19, 2006
(*) In Memory of Michael Zebuhr September 21, 1980 - March 19, 2006 (3/1/06) Aluminum Glows (*) Justice for Michael Zebuhr |
|||||
Following the murder of my student, Michael Zebuhr, a truly extraordinary human being, I received an email telling me, "we've done it before and we will do it again if need be." Michael told me, "Whatever happens, don't ever stop pursuing this. It's too important." Had Michael not been murdered, how long would it have taken for him to make the connection between his uncle (Bill Zebuhr), Gene Mallove, and Steven E. Jones? |
Heavy Watergate: The War Against Cold Fusion pt 1 of 5
|
Heavy Watergate: The War Against Cold Fusion pt 2 of 5
|
|
|
Figure 21. Segment from the video, Heavy Watergate. (0:09:58) URL, |
Figure 22. Segment from the video, Heavy Watergate. (0:08:29) URL, |
Heavy Watergate: The War Against Cold Fusion pt 3 of 5
|
Heavy Watergate: The War Against Cold Fusion pt 4 of 5
|
|
|
Figure 23. Segment from the video, Heavy Watergate. (0:08:56) URL, |
Figure 24. Segment from the video, Heavy Watergate. (0:09:42) URL, |
Heavy Watergate: The War Against Cold Fusion pt 5 of 5
|
|
Figure 25. Segment from the video, Heavy Watergate. (0:08:17) URL, |
Continue to next page.
|
Top | homepage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|